Enrique Rojas: Violation of professional secrecy (1)'s fame is nothing but a misunderstanding of others ( Rilke). 
The Medical Association of Madrid, filed the complaint in the case that reflects the item you bring here, but in picture 4, you can see how the behavior of Enrique Rojas was described publicly as "social terrorism" by the Medical Council of Spain.
It seems that the general pattern is saying one thing publicly while the back is another.
the end we leave the transcript of the article (although it reads well enough in the photos).
Enrique Rojas, Interviú 1 
Enrique Rojas, Interviú 2 
Enrique Rojas, Interviú 3 
Enrique Rojas, Interviú 4 
Enrique Rojas, document UCM (1) 
Enrique Rojas, Remedies for indifference
( flip view book) 
UCM
text document (1):
(1) Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology - Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense) .
In reply to your letter dated June 10, 2004 you are hereby notified that D. Enrique Rojas Montes has not been nor is Professor of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University Complutense of Madrid.
What we communicate to the appropriate purposes.
Madrid, June 11, 2004
DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOLOGY MEDICAL
Signed:
Tomás Ortiz Alonso * Interference in the environment and family life of the victim without the knowledge of it (ie treason), it is common practice Enrique Rojas, using to convince "his position" as Professor of Psychiatry at the University Complutense of Madrid, which has proven to be false, as seen in the attached document.
Like to be false
almost all professional identifications used by Dr. Enrique Rojas to date.
We leave here a sample.
Enrique
Rojas, is Professor of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology
of
Complutense University (2) 
Enrique Rojas, fax
Dean of the Faculty of Psychology, UCM (3) 
Enrique Rojas, College of Physicians
of Madrid (4) 
(2) Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology - SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY COMPLUTENSE Saturio José Gutiérrez Martín January 23, 2009 Dear
Mr
. Gutiérrez
:
In reply to your fax dated 01.19.1909 that he
nanifiesto D. Enrique Rojas Montes has never been Professor of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology at the University Complutense of Madrid.
Sincerely,
Signed
Tomás Ortiz Alonso Director of the Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology
UCM (3) COMPLUTENSE UNIVERSITY OF MADRID - SCHOOL OF PSYCHOLOGY From: DEAN OF THE FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY
A: D. Carlos Martín
Barja
Dear Mr . Barja
,
Report that in the cloister professor in the School of Psychology at the Complutense University of Madrid there is no one named Enrique Rojas Montes. Nor is Professor of Psychiatry at the School.
Sincerely,
Carlos Gallego Lopez
Dean of the Faculty of Psychology, UCM
SCHOOL OF PSYCHOLOGY - DEAN
(4) Official College of Physicians of Madrid Text: In reply to your fax dated 12/01/2009 informed him that in the archives of this illustrious body is inscribed Dr. D. Enrique Rojas Montes with a degree in Medicine. Has not registered any specialty.
Regards,
Collegiate department
Repeat ,
Today November 7, 2009, the news services of the English television network Telecinco have issued the following news:
An inspector from the SGAE (General Society of Authors and Publishers), found that a hairdresser had put the radio to their customers and did not pay the fee for the SGAE (12E/mes). seems incredible that in 25 years, any inspector of the English Ministry of Public Health - or any other ministry - the Ministry Health AC Madrid - or any other officer - has been detected ** Enrique Rojas fraud or concealment that has been given to this subject scope and held the summit, at the cost of malpractice and deception . ** Enrique Rojas has more than 10 books for sale with professional false identification and full consultation of patients - often vulnerable - that believing professor of psychiatry at the University Complutense of Madrid " , pay your cache and think they are in good hands when they are actually in the hands of a liar and a rogue team of accomplices, who do not mind misleading the patient. and also has a nose that steps on it, Enrique Rojas on your web 
winery Bodegas Enrique Rojas Magi (one of many sites
Rojas handling).
The honesty of this man beyond any mold ...
must distinguish between doctors not to apply the most appropriate treatment to the patient by lack of training, media or difference of opinion and inventing diseases on people and trapping have attracted an inquiry into believing they are sick, while personally involved
in their environment in order to find it easier to cancel them or remove them from the middle and get the property, more or less - to Enrique Rojas does not care as long as it's something - changing hands.
Some jobs are never free. The recidivism and path of deception with which he reached the top of Dr. Enrique Rojas Montes, is data that can not be avoided .
With this post we as good inspectors in the field of health, such as the SGAE .
Enrique Rojas Learn more about this blog,
http://librosenriquerojas.blogspot.com/ And this link
some info about the seriousness of the violation of professional secrecy (under No 20 and 42, we see the evolution of our criminal code),
www.txoriherri.com / secretomedico_archivos / frame.htm (slides
master taught at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid by Dr
.
Juan Medrano , a specialist in Legal Medicine). When Enrique Rojas
violated the right to privacy and confidentiality with Maria Isabel Menchaca
of Salamanca, the offense was out of the Penal Code at the time it was committed by Rojas (Spain applies the code more appropriate to the offender), it might be the reason for the benevolence of the ruling.
Transcript article Interviú JORGE JUSTE, A FORTUNE FOR YOUR CHILDREN.
DIVORCE DEMAND OF ILLEGALLY USED REPORT PSYCHIATRIC game was in the administration of the vast fortune of the children. And Jorge Juste did not hesitate to dip into their friend, the famous psychiatrist Enrique Rojas, to prepare a report on his
ex-wife Maria Menchaca
, which contributed to the divorce. Now, Enrique Rojas has been convicted betraying confidentiality. And Jorge Juste has not achieved its goal, keep the millions of their children.
For ex wife Jorge Juste, Maria Menchaca
, the suggestion of her then-husband, to go to the psychiatrist's Enrique Rojas, was the beginning of an ordeal: "I took those pills and I was like a cork. "
official, its marriage for money
When Jorge Juste found Maria Menchaca
, granddaughter of the Marquis of Salamanca and Viscountess de Bahia Honda today, she did not know him or trade or benefit. They met for the first time in a backgammon tournament
and Mary lé liked that
Guapito twenties and friendly. They married and
-ron Tuvia three children and, after eating a few partridges, stopped being
feli-ces and each went his way. "George was precisely the bombastic side of pickup and began dating actress and made-ra
TV Ana Garcia Obregon a very turbulent relationship that ended up as the string of dawn. Since then, Ana makes Juste a stock when asked.
Connected in television, followed flirt with Terelu
Campos daughter's Maria Teresa Campos. Did not last too long. And change of pace to the models. First with Marta molds, and also with (fuzzy text missing here) heart like Martha Chavarri
and so on more or less contrasted. This string of affairs has been a reputation of frivolous superficial. Of their marriage, and three children, took, say, al-
gun trade to benefit some mo
-verse in areas that probably would have, by birth and / or checking account, forbidden. In short, it took a marriage for money important.
TEXT ANTONIO PARDO
Jorge Juste-known for his adventures with, among others, actress and TV presenter Ana Obregon
Garcia wanted to take his ex
wife, Viscountess Bay
Hon-da, Maria Menchaca
the custody of their three
hi-jos, heirs, indeed, the
in - mensa
fortune from her grandmother ma-triplet, which may have when they reach majority old. Meanwhile, Jorge, to have achieved its objective, the ha-bria
administered. To get that save and custo
-
day, the handsome Madrid did not hesitate to furnish the divorce process a report of the famous psychiatrist Enrique Rojas. Report this doctor "very good friend of Jorge Juste-produced with information
-
information that you extracted when Mary
Menchaca was his patient. In other words, ignored the professional secrecy to favor his friend.
Juste-
Marriage Menchaca began to sink in 1991. In-
tonka the husband suggested that she go to the query of knowledge
-do psychiatrist and prominent member
- Bro
of Opus Dei Enrique Rojas, who passed for a
specialist in matrimonial matters
and Mary decided to ignore George. It was December 1991. "Upon entering the query, I wanted to give an injection," says Mary
Menchaca. She, surprised, flatly refused
. "I, who had come to talk about my marriage, I met (fuzzy text missing here). In fact, I was given a treatment that I sat fatal." Dr. Rojas
him
a whole series of psychological tests and reached diagnosis with time-ria
totally refuted by the pro-fessor
José María
Poveda, University of Madrid. But after his first diagnosis, now considered wrong by others
specialists - Dr. Ro-jas
started medicating with antidepressants
strong
Mary Menchaca : "I took those pills and I was like a cork."
One day, at home, Jorge Juste told he had been for fifteen years, the love of Mary Menchaca
: "Look how is the lady.
Po -
ber ...! Maybe we need
in - to enter a
.
the end, Mary
Men -
chaca decided to cut the treatment and doctor visits Rojas, and everything returned to normal.
The 'power of ruin' Marriage languished and was finally completed the separation in October 1993. Then began the process of divorce.
Pa - ra
her immense surprise, Maria Menchaca
is found that in the divorce petition filed by Jorge Juste included an information
Psychiatric -me prepared by En-Rojas
wealth, where a series of data revealed confidential
particular query had
-man had with Mary.
Moreover, the psychiatrist, without the consent of the mother, interviewed
-
tó the children to use their declaration
tion against her in the divorce trial.
The aim of the report, the decision was to determine the custody of the children of Bia-
to remain in the hands of Jorge Juste, from which moreover, the ruling makes clear that is a personal friend of the psychiatrist Enrique Rojas. In this report, Rojas, who was never consulted as an expert
. but as witness Jorge Juste, said, "declares Mary Menchaca
-" my husband was a balanced person and I was not able to care for my children. "
- Jorge Juste wanted to stay with the children or the fortune to inherit?
"That's a good question. In any case, the sentence that condemns Dr. Rojas is very clear about this, and I do not need further comment.
- What did your husband when you met?
-Nothing. Although now says it is the employer. Was a ma
-not in front and one behind.
"Well, now has its negotiations
-
price ...
"And a Porsche
fifteen million pesetas
tions, and a Mercedes and I do not know what else ... I'm surprised that a pub
given for both. The truth is that I gave a general power over my property, which is what the notaries called "the power of destruction."
Menchaca When Mary saw the psychiatric report
Henry Rojas, decided to sue. This initially drew the lawyer Jose Miguel Castillo Granada Calvin
. The ruling of the case-it just made public and condemned to
Enri -Rojas, who was found guilty, according to the statement, "a trespass in the area of \u200b\u200bfundamental right to inti
-
accordance . "
And
stresses that the pre-set this report, developed intimate data, "with such conductors
- ta
seems clear that betrayed the trust elemental governs the physician-patient relationship and the duty of confidentiality
that vin -
culaba the doctor. "
The judge blamed the popular Rojas psychiatrist states that acted at the request of Jorge Juste," it remains difficult to conclude that the friendship to a greater or lesser extent, between them, Mr. Juste and Dr. Rojas Montes, was decisive for the issuance of the report and its contribution to the process of divorce. "He concludes that" just as certain is that the defendant knew that his infor-me, clearly unfavorable to Mrs. Menchaca Salamanca, could result in serious injury for this, such as the deprivation of custody of their children. (Fuzzy text missing here),
... regardless other economic effects, inherent in the condition of the children of heirs to a fortune of his maternal grandmother), which underscores the seriousness of the breach of profes-sional obligations.
The sentence against Dr. Enrico-Rojas evidence in this way! to maneuver contrived long ago by the former husband of Maria Menchaca, Jorge Juste, and psychiatrist to obtain data that years later would be used against the interests of Mary.
In his diagnosis, Dr. Rojas she showed that she had a chronic illness, disputed point with absolute firmness luta by Professor José María Poveda. who following the same procedures, concluded that the diagnosis and treatment were wrong.
According to that opinion, Maria Menchaca is perfectly equipped to play its role co-mo mother, as confirmed by the divorce decree.
"social terrorism" The next step taken Juste and Rojas's friends was using the psychiatric report, absolutely confidential mind to present Tarlo in divorce. To have paid off the maneuver, Jorge Juste had been in the custody of their children and with the fortune of them, until they were older.
"Dr. Rojas, a member of Opus Dei," concludes Mary Menchaca-always preaches moral ethics and you do not understand how graduates are per retain the title. What has happened to me should not happen to anyone else. Hope College Doctors take action on the matter. Of course, my lawyer. Calvin Castillo is on it. "
Dr. Gonzalo Herranz, the Secretary-ethics committee of the General Council! Doctors, declares that interview. independently of the ju-diciales resolutions, with cases like this should open, if there is a one-nuncio-research, by the College of Medical-doctor me against the offender, because it involves "a very serious offense."
He explains that the fact that the doctor without the patient's consent, a report A third person, you can use it against the patient, could be defined as "social terrorism. Where, he asks, would the English law gives protection-cough or the right to privacy if anyone could anger a doctor and ask for reports of one of their patients to use as I want? ". Maria Menchaca
complaint-do has already Enrique Rojas to the College of Physicians of Madrid. How-ever, does not have many hopes that his complaint to move forward: "I know" says "that the Co-lege of Physicians, and corporatism, like en-Terre the issue."
Casti-llo attorney Calvin, who did not want to go assess the content of the above, explains that "the new Penal Code of 1995 addressed to an ex-da-prey-tion typifies-tion reveals the secret professional crime. "In other words, if the report! Dr. Rojas produced by a con-ra-tar a few months in, it could have ended up in jail.
wondered
intoned ces why a famous psychiatrist Enrique Rojas-beating was left with a character such as Jorge Juste vacuo to carry out such an assembly.
Enrique Rojas is primarily a highly valued psychiatrist whose skills are, he says, that of arranging marriages. This doctor, a member of Opus, a recently published book "Love Smart" in addressing the issue of marital relations and the problems of stop-ja. In this book ensures that spirituality is a fundamental element in marriage.
Maria Menchaca says of him now, if that character was co-sa any less spiritual. The sentence has not been convicted, either, on too spirituality in its intervention in the divorce proceedings between Mary Menchaca and Jorge Juste, and did try to seriously impair per-Marie, both spiritual guardianship and custody of their children-and materially-controlling the fortunes of the kids are heirs.
now have to deal with the complaint that Mary Menchaca has put to the College of Physicians and to the Ombudsman for not respecting the most spiritual of physicians, confidentiality and trust of the patient.
Text: Antonio Pardo. Interview, March 12, 1998.
same 
